Allahabad High Court. (file photo)
The Hindu side has filed a caveat before the Allahabad High Court regarding the Advocacy Commission’s survey at Sambhal’s Shahi Jama Masjid. Harishankar Jain and Parth Yadav have demanded in this advisory that if the Muslim side files a petition, no order should be passed in the matter without hearing the Hindu side.
This warning was filed in the context of the suit relating to the inspection order passed by the Sambhal Civil Judge on November 19. The dispute between the Hindu and Muslim parties regarding this survey report is deepening. Meanwhile, the Supreme Court today has also ordered the Muslim side to approach the Allahabad High Court. It is believed that the Muslim side will soon file its petition against the decision of the civil judge in the Allahabad High Court.
You can go to the High Court muslim side
Following today’s directions from the Supreme Court, the Muslim side can file its petition before the Allahabad High Court on Monday. It is believed that after the filing of the petition, the court will also give an opportunity to the Hindu party that filed the caveat to present its arguments. The hearing in this case is likely to take place next week.
The Indian side had already filed a caveat in the High Court regarding a possible petition against the inspection order. This warning was presented before the Supreme Court even before the hearing held today. Regarding the Sambhal Court inspection order, the Hindu side had expressed fear that the Muslim side would approach the High Court. Currently, this matter has become sensitive both from a religious and legal point of view, and all eyes are on its next hearing.
Temporary stoppage imposed on the survey process
However, the Muslim side approached the Supreme Court before filing the petition in the High Court. During today’s hearing, the Supreme Court temporarily stayed the survey process and directed the Muslim side to approach the High Court. Now, after the petition is filed in the High Court, the matter is expected to heat up again. The court will make the next decision only after hearing all parties.
