Mahayuti is contesting a surprising election in Maharashtra. The BJP has spoken out against aggressive Hindutva. On the other hand, its ally the NCP and some BJP leaders have spoken out against Bantenge and Katenge. If we are divided then we will be cut or if we are united then we will be safe is the most important issue of the election campaign this time in Maharashtra in the BJP. Not only this, the party has promised an anti-conversion law in its manifesto, farmers are being warned that as per the Congress rules, their land may come into the hands of the Waqf Board, also associated with the Razakars of Hyderabad State. A video of BJP leader Deputy Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis has emerged in which he makes a strong attack linking AIMIM with Aurangzeb and vows to capture Pakistan. On the contrary, voices against it have begun to be raised in the party and in the alliance. But there is no action against anyone. Everything is a disaster. But such confusion cannot happen on its own in a party like the BJP. No political analyst can accept this.
1- Look how much contradiction there is
Firstly, NCP leader Ajit Pawar speaks against ‘Bantenge to Katenge’. Before this it is said that Modi-Yogi or Shah will not hold meetings for NCP candidates. But on November 12, Ajit Pawar and Prime Minister Narendra Modi were seen speaking on the stage of the Pune rally, but they went missing from the Mumbai rally on November 14. NCP leaders give ticket to Nawab Malik’s daughter, who speaks ill of BJP and even PM Modi. Then they also give entry to Nawab Malik. Before this, Baba also gives a ticket to Siddiqui’s son Zeeshan Siddiqui. The BJP only always opposes it. The meeting continues. NCP leader Ajit Pawar said he does not agree with the BJP’s conversion. After this, BJP leader Pankaja Munde also opposes the split. He says it is good for Uttar Pradesh but there is no place for it in Maharashtra. The matter becomes serious following opposition from former Chief Minister of the state and current BJP Rajya Sabha member Ashok Chavan. But the BJP is silent. Their leaders remain silent. Are the party leaders not able to digest this rise of Hindutva in Maharashtra? Are there other leaders who burn from within? Or is this rebellious language a result of internal politics? Or everyone is happy agreeing with each other.
The 2-BJP was lagging behind on caste and farmer issues, the solution was found in Hindutva.
Marathas are angry with the Bharatiya Janata Party in Maharashtra. If Rahul Gandhi’s caste census move works, then backward votes seem certain to be affected. The party is still facing difficulties in regaining the Dalit votes that they had lost in the Lok Sabha elections. All of this can be brought together with a single solution. For this, the BJP was organizing anti-love jihad rallies across the state through an organization called Sakal Hindu Samaj. Which has the support of senior BJP leaders. Devendra Fadnavis has not only included Vote Jihad in the election discussion. At Versova headquarters in Mumbai, Fadnavis said that Love Jihad and Land Jihad will have to be fought with a religious war. In fact, the BJP is rightly worried that the Maha Vikas Aghadi (If Maratha). -Muslim unity is forming behind the MVA, it may be clear that the BJP adopted this strategy when it became clear that efforts to resolve caste and farmer issues were not yielding adequate results. According to a report, farmers list many complaints in this regard. poor management of the agricultural sector by Mahayuti, but they also say that the credit for maintaining the Hindutva agenda must be given to them, that is, the BJP.
3- Apart from the Hindus, the votes of the Muslims are also needed.
In fact, with the kind of protest that is going on, it seems that the Mahayuti leaders want to get the votes of the minorities along with the Hindus. Now see, Ajit Pawar is protesting that a large chunk of his vote bank comes from Hindus. This is the reason why they have fielded many Muslim candidates in the elections, including Nawab Malik’s daughter Sana Malik, Hasan Mushrim and Baba Siddiqui’s son Zeeshan Siddiqui. It is obvious that they want to get Hindu votes on behalf of Modi and the BJP and if they are divided, they should also get minority votes by opposing the cuts. But this is just playing with fire. It is possible that both will keep their distance from the PCN candidate. Similarly, there is opposition to Pankaja Munde. He is a veteran OBC leader and his politics revolves around Beed. While the 12 per cent Muslim voters are the X factor, Pankaja does not want these voters to come close to the MVA. Secondly, she is also angry with the state BJP. It’s possible that she is saying this because of internal politics. The third leader is Ashok Chavan. Chavan is a long-time Congressman. He has been doing politics since Nanded, where the Muslim population is about 14 per cent. His daughter Shrijaya from Bhokar is also in the electoral field as she has old relations with many Muslim workers and leaders. Those relationships must be maintained and capitalized on. What harm is there if some old relationships remain intact by opposing a slogan?
