Greater Noida, Raftaar today. Corruption in Greater Noida Authority Another case has come to light in which a Department of Lands demanding bribe from a real estate consultant Serious accusations have been made. Rs 1,500 was collected per petitioner on behalf of a 10 per cent plot in Habibpur village. Square meter Bribery There is a plea to ask. this matter Both the Supreme Court and the Superior Court was raised in, where the Court not only Supreme Court ordered investigation against land consultancy He also confirmed the previous decision.
The whole issue: What are the accusations and the court order?
background: Ignore order and compliance of the Supreme Court
In 2014, the Supreme Court ruled against the petitioners from Habibpur village. In exchange for the society's land while a verdict is given in favor of allocate 10 percent of the plot Orders were given. allegation that Following this order in the land department of Greater Noida Authority It was not done.
After this, the land-The consultant attempted to demand a bribe of Rs 1,500 per square meter from the petitioners.,
Judicial action and instructions
The petitioners again raised this matter before the court, considering the matter to be serious, the High Court ordered an inquiry and asked the director general of the authority to file an affidavit. The court made it clear that if the allegations are proven true, it would be a case of serious corruption.
Controversy over preparation of land consultancy deadline extension
The investigation into the case is still ongoing. land consultant Preparations are being made to increase services. land consultant The current time period has expired.
But, despite the controversy and accusations, Discussion over the authority's extension of its mandate raised concerns about ethics and transparency. But questions have arisen. After the court order, will the decision to reinstate said official be in the interest of the authority?
The rigor of the court against corruption
in this case High Court and Supreme Court The posture of both is strict. The Supreme Court had already ordered that 10 per cent of the plots be allotted soon. superior court Aimed at strengthening the investigation and accountability process to guarantee it. The court also asked if there was any laxity in the investigation.
What does the judicial system and administrative ethics say?
Official associated with corruption:
The continuation of the services of those who have faced serious accusations of demanding bribes raises questions about administrative ethics.
Research transparency:
The CEO will have to file an affidavit and clarify whether the investigation order in this matter has been complied with or not.
Responsibility of the authority:
Is the Greater Noida Authority tarnishing its image by promoting such officials?
Conclusion and way forward
this matter Administrative transparency against corruption It's the exam. On the one hand, the court has considered corruption serious and has ordered an investigation and action. On the other hand, The operation of the authority preparing for the increase in the term of the territorial advisor. But questions are arising.
Tags #GreaterNoida #Corruption #Court Orders #Bribery Case #RaftarToday #NoidaNews #Transparency #Accountability #JusticeForFarmers
🛑 Tap the link below to join Raftar Today WhatsApp channel.
Follow the Raftar Today channel on WhatsApp
Twitter (X): Raftar Today (@raftartoday)
